This image was originally published in Filmifare magazine and Bollywood memories just re-posted.
Hot
Hot Indian men, shirtless Bollywood hunks, sexiest male models only at https://shirtlessbollywoodmen.blogspot.com
A blog dedicated to hot Indian actors, the best male models and the cutest (fit!) guys from India. Mostly shirtless. See all the hunks of Bollywood ie Indian Cinema, here, from Aamir to Zayed Khan! We're not one for great actors or cinematic legends, just the hotties who take their shirt off often. ;o)
Yup, Akki certainly was the hottest actor from the early 90s through the early noughties. And IMO, there hasn't been another leading man who matched his sheer earthy, rugged charisma either before or after his prime. Hrithik and possibly Sid Malhotra may be more classically handsome, Aditya Roy Kapur and obv Hrithik again probably have a more ripped physique - but in terms of powerhouse sex appeal, Akshay fu***ng Kumar was and is, in a league of his own. The bevy of Bollywood beauties in his thrall obviously attest to this! :-)
ReplyDeleteThere was a poll in the US sometime back, asking gay men which star's photo made them realize their orientation. The name most mentioned was Chris Evans (his shirtless, hairy chested photoshoot, and his roles in Cellular/Fantastic Four), and next IIRC was Jake Gyllenhaal (again, his fuzzy chested photoshoot/film roles). If a similar poll was to be taken among Indian gay men who hit puberty in those 10/15 years between 1992--2007, my guess is that the overwhwlmingly vast majority would identify Akshay as their muse....
BTW, if you're going to use terms referencing LGBT subgroups like "Bear", "Cub" etc, do it right. You've referenced Akshay here as "Cub Lite" since he wasn't as hairy as Anil Kapoor (whom you term a Bear). But as you may know, these terms refer not only to hairiness, but also to build. A Cub is a hairy man with a big/husky build - not as large as a Bear (and a younger demographic), but definitely towards a heavy physique/ high BMI. Akshay on the other hand was always very athletic, fit and well built. He would be termed as a Wolf subgroup, not a Cub or "Cub-Lite".
Yup, Akki certainly was the hottest actor from the early 90s through the early noughties. And IMO, there hasn't been another leading man who matched his sheer earthy, rugged charisma either before or after his prime. Hrithik and possibly Sid Malhotra may be more classically handsome, Aditya Roy Kapur and obv Hrithik again probably have a more ripped physique - but in terms of powerhouse sex appeal, Akshay fu***ng Kumar was and is, in a league of his own. The bevy of Bollywood beauties in his thrall obviously attest to this! :-)
ReplyDeleteThere was a poll in the US sometime back, asking gay men which star's photo made them realize their orientation. The name most mentioned was Chris Evans (his shirtless, hairy chested photoshoot, and his roles in Cellular/Fantastic Four), and next IIRC was Jake Gyllenhaal (again, his hairy chested photoshoot/film roles). If a similar poll was to be taken among Indian gay men who hit puberty in those 10/15 years between 1992--2007, my guess is that the vast majority would identify Akshay as their muse...
BTW, if you're going to use terms referencing Gay subgroups like "Bear", "Cub" etc, do it right. You've referenced Akshay here as "Cub Lite" since he wasn't as hairy as Anil Kapoor (whom you term a Bear). But as you may know, these terms refer not only to hairiness, but also to build. A Cub is a hairy man with a big/husky build - not as large as a Bear (and a younger demographic), but definitely towards a heavier physique/ high BMI. Akshay on the other hand was always athletic, fit and well built. He was toned, not excessively bulky. He would be termed as a Wolf subgroup, not a Cub or "Cub-Lite".